What is the primary difference in qualified privilege compared to absolute privilege?

The primary difference between qualified privilege and absolute privilege lies in the degree of protection each provides regarding statements made. Qualified privilege allows for some discretion in making the statement, meaning that a person can defend their statements even if they are not strictly true, as long as the statement was made in good faith and within the scope of their duties. This is often applicable in contexts where the speaker has a responsibility to communicate certain information, such as in reports or opinions about someone's professional conduct.

In contrast, absolute privilege provides complete protection regardless of the truth or motive behind the statement, usually in specific situations such as legislative debates or judicial proceedings. This means that an individual cannot be sued for defamation for statements made in these contexts, regardless of intent or accuracy. The concept of discretion inherent in qualified privilege highlights the importance of the context and the intention behind a statement, focusing on the responsible sharing of information, which is a critical aspect of Public Relations and communication practices.